I’ll read Victor’s paper in a bit. Just read a couple of your articles. One on Trump made me think that’s why he keeps coming out with bath5hit statements or dancing on stage when he’s already had two attempts on his life - he’ll plead insanity and not fit for trial if he loses the presidential campaign. 🤞🏻
Back to MH370, we know it’s easy to access the e/e bay, we know mechanics have a way to test the plane when it’s on the ground, we know that some repairs require the plane to be jacked and the plane to be ‘told’ it has weight-on-wheels, we know that there is a cyber-security report on the 777. When people say there is no proof that this hasn’t been done, is this simply because they don’t have the plane in their possession? Because it seems as though there is evidence to suggest that it was cyber-jacked, and vulnerabilities with access to the e/e bay made that possible. It all seems very confusing to understand why South was ever considered given that radar showed it heading North (NNW?). Common sense, Occam’s Razor, whatever people spout for the BFO data being correct and the plane went South can also be used for the radar data showing it went North.
I’ll read Victor’s paper in a bit. Just read a couple of your articles. One on Trump made me think that’s why he keeps coming out with bath5hit statements or dancing on stage when he’s already had two attempts on his life - he’ll plead insanity and not fit for trial if he loses the presidential campaign. 🤞🏻
Back to MH370, we know it’s easy to access the e/e bay, we know mechanics have a way to test the plane when it’s on the ground, we know that some repairs require the plane to be jacked and the plane to be ‘told’ it has weight-on-wheels, we know that there is a cyber-security report on the 777. When people say there is no proof that this hasn’t been done, is this simply because they don’t have the plane in their possession? Because it seems as though there is evidence to suggest that it was cyber-jacked, and vulnerabilities with access to the e/e bay made that possible. It all seems very confusing to understand why South was ever considered given that radar showed it heading North (NNW?). Common sense, Occam’s Razor, whatever people spout for the BFO data being correct and the plane went South can also be used for the radar data showing it went North.
Thanks for this, Keelie -- Yes, I have a new piece up on New York magazine, about how Trump will likely go to prison if he doesn't win re-election: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-prison-election.html
As for MH370's possible vulnerability, you raise excellent points. I'll be revisiting the topic in upcoming episodes of the new season.