Thanks for information, but don't agree with you that UFO's are not real. I had an experience in the late 69's around age 8 or 9 when my father, a USAF retired pilot, was stationed at Luke AFB. Discounting children's exeriences is a mistake. I can remember several friends names and our experiences. I remember the exact location on a black and white aerial photo of the base during the 1960's. So why would I not remember being stopped dead when running home for dinner from my friend's home, having a huge area lighting up, being raised up under something, then being inside laying on something, and other things during an abduction, then being back where I was with time lapse and late after dark for dinner. I suppose like you being put with the loch Ness Monster and Sasquatch, you want to categorize me as a UFO whackado. I didn't know there was an avionics journalist alive that didn't believe in UFOs, or is it just you don't consider them to be Unidentified?
Later in life I told my military friends, my family, and even reported to MUFON over the last ~10 years. Only more recently have I been willing to hang my arse out and tell my story to others, because as I age I care less about what others think. I was was not a meek child, a bit of a Tom Boy and tenacious. I have always been okay with what happened and have wanted to be hypnotized to try and unlock more information, but never knew where to go and who to see. I welcome challenges, as anyone would telling the truth. Your truths about a missing plane are theories based on some knowns and some possibilities, plus some none impossibilities. My truth when it comes to a UFO is based on live physical experience. It's always easy to discount a child, but would anyone discount their child at age 8, if they came home and said a man tried to grab me into his car but I ran. People see what they want to see, but they also believe what they want to believe when they are given information. Does this mean I believe Ashton Forbes theory? Not in this case, but who knows whether something odd didn't happen and the plane entered some area taking out instrumentation in clouds and the plane came out somewhere else totally disoriented. Shoot maybe it's at the bottom of the Bering Sea ( :
I am not saying I think this happened, but strange things have happened on this Earth that so far are unexplainable, but not unreal. He is just putting forth one more theory.
Ufos aren't real then how come the U.S and multiple other militarys are now saying the complete opposite plus the fact commercial pilots are now coming forward and the reports are mind blowing unlike your second rate report .
Ashton Forbes' research and theory have achieved success due to their extensive and thorough nature. The distinction between conspiracy and conspiracy theory lies in the application of the scientific method, which involves gathering actual scientific data, corroborating it, identifying contradictions, and comprehensively analyzing the findings. Ashton Forbes applies this approach to his research alongside authors of scientific papers who testify as guests on technology-related topics.
Regarding 9/11, I must mention Dr. Judy Wood. She is the only published researcher with degrees in Structural Engineering who has employed this same scientific method. Additionally, MH370 technology supports her findings and data.
None of Dunbar's disputes are based on scientific data; they consist of opinions or unprovable "convenient" hearsay evidence that lack scientifically researched or peer-reviewed studies.
I am interested in your thoughts on my comment; please feel free to email me at your convenience at cr8zdayz31@gmail.com. Thank you.
Ashton Forbes' research and theory have achieved success due to their extensive and thorough nature. The distinction between conspiracy and conspiracy theory lies in the application of the scientific method, which involves gathering actual scientific data, corroborating it, identifying contradictions, and comprehensively analyzing the findings. Ashton Forbes applies this approach to his research alongside authors of scientific papers who testify as guests on technology-related topics.
Regarding 9/11, I must mention Dr. Judy Wood. She is the only published researcher with degrees in Structural Engineering who has employed this same scientific method. Additionally, MH370 technology supports her findings and data.
None of Dunbar's disputes are based on scientific data; they consist of opinions or unprovable "convenient" hearsay evidence that lack scientifically researched or peer-reviewed studies.
I am interested in your thoughts on my comment; please feel free to email me at your convenience at cr8zdayz31@gmail.com. Thank you.
No, Ashton Forbes is 100 percent crank. He is not gathering scientific data, he is manufacturing obvious nonsense, but you believe it because you want to believe it. You are an extremely gullible rube.
In your post production segment you discuss using "drifters" for debris tracking evaluations. A company that may be worth taking to is Saildrone from Alameda California. They deploy unmanned data gathering devices all over the ocean world for currents, tide, depths, temperatures, etc for the sale of the data. This humanitarian challenge may be something that would also interest them.
Mark, I like your thinking -- I'm sure Saildrone could have a lot of interesting Lepas data, but when I reached out to them they didn't want to talk about anything beyond their actual projects.
This was another great episode! We really enjoyed your guest and would like to read his book. It's incredible that Ashton Forbes wants people to believe that he not only solved the mystery of MH370 but was able to catch it on video at several different, perfectly clear angles. What you said about how "the algorithm is the gatekeeper" is bang on and sums up the world today very well (a depressing thought). Keep up the good work!
Thanks so much, Rochelle! Really glad you liked it. Yes, not only was the magical moment caught in perfect clarity from two different angles, but in addition to solving aviation's greatest mystery he obtained the first unambiguous footage of a UFO (three, no less!) as well as proving the existence of wormholes. So, quite an achievement, probably worth three Nobel prizes at least.
You are categorically incorrect in matter of your gross over exaggerations, of your own biased beliefs & prejudices, regarding ‘UFOs’ & a few other ridiculous things you’re insisting.
From your own writ;
“On its face, the whole thing is ridiculous.
^Merely dismissive opinion.
You wish us to not proceed into the material with open minds, then, but to instead, adopt your ‘ultimatum of assumptive belief’.
For one thing, UFOs aren’t real — or, if they are, they’ve never so casually revealed themselves as they do in this video.
^OH, PLZZZZ.
Go ahead & call the Military & Commercial Pilots & highly trained, experienced Surveillance Technicians of the WORLD, all liars.
My favorite would be the
USS Nimitz’ escort vessels having been watching a bunch of ‘UFOs’, for at least a week,
on our best combat radars, before directing Com. Fravor’s fought to inspect them.
All those pilots & backseat technologists must all be crazy liars?
You prefer that?
Besides other very otherwise serious Mil-Industrial functions of States, that have been very committed to a
8 decade shell game, that’s been painfully obvious.
As far as I’d insist, is, it’s a really big Galaxy out there, or, Interdimensionally, that it should not be surprising, if very intelligent life exists & is even in our home environment.
Your bias is showing, & why couldn’t ET life, if advanced beyond ourselves, exist, let alone have means to execute their travels?
And interdimensional portals aren’t real, either, except in Marvel movies.
^You are speaking in ignorance here.
ID Portals have been visually & electronically recorded by the Research Crew at Skywalker Ranch.
Insisting they *could only exist* in Marvel comics media, expresses only your bias; & ignorance.
Yet for a great many people, the videos seem seem utterly real. They think that Ashton Forbes has solved the mystery of MH370.”
^I’ve just started screening the Forbes material.
My opinion on MH370 media & analysis, will still be out for months moreso, I bet.
And this is the only point I’ll give you a break about.
You’ve simply typed up a personally aggravated waste of text, hoping to convince others that your assumptiveness, is somehow, the BEST & ONLY opinion to believe?
How very arrogant & ignorant of you; I’ve neither, assumed a blasted thing about said videos, I’ve never been even hopeful, that such a terrible thing could even be possible.
I recall the Military downings of civilian aircraft over the past few decades, it’s a terrible topic, & why should we assume, it ‘couldn’t have been’ a Military mistake, or similar fault?
What if it’s not ‘UFOs’?
We must examine all aspects before going sputtering Mick West type assumptions & bad guesses, as you’ve done here.
Do I wish ‘to believe’?
In general, YES, it would help me understand my own ET & UFO experiences.
Go ahead & call ME, a liar.
What should I CARE?
I’d certainly say all of this to your face in public, as well.
I wouldn't use the word "liar," I would use the word "delusional." And I don't think it's a matter of mental illness. I just think that people are entered by the idea that fantastical things could be real, and so choose to suspend their critical reasoning.
i have a 70 page pdf proving that America has access to the technology to make what is depicted. in the videos by regicide_anon. you talk about widely accepted evidence for what happened to MH370. Well here it is. https://x.com/i/grok/share/e4aCkya5izLFSdf8Xm0xz9aiK
But does it matter what he's claiming? The whole thing is so absurd on its face, it's like arguing about whether the earth is flat or shaped like a Pringle...
Jeff, I really appreciated your guest. Webster's Dictionary needs to place his picture in their entry for "sanity." Reaching back to 9/11, my only personal connection to the events of that day concerns a woman in my wife's writers' group. Her husband was giving flying lessons in Florida and had three Middle Eastern men come in for lessons. On their second visit, Rick heard some talk that concerned him. He called the FBI, and was told that they would look into it. He called back sometime later and pretty much got blown off. When the pictures of the 9/11 hijackers were shown, the three who had come for lessons were among them.
As for Rick, he was the Captain of that Atlas Air 767 that crashed into Trinity Bay near Houston. He was handling the radio when the pilot flying thought he was in a stall and went full forward on the yoke. Sad ending for a good man.
Thanks for information, but don't agree with you that UFO's are not real. I had an experience in the late 69's around age 8 or 9 when my father, a USAF retired pilot, was stationed at Luke AFB. Discounting children's exeriences is a mistake. I can remember several friends names and our experiences. I remember the exact location on a black and white aerial photo of the base during the 1960's. So why would I not remember being stopped dead when running home for dinner from my friend's home, having a huge area lighting up, being raised up under something, then being inside laying on something, and other things during an abduction, then being back where I was with time lapse and late after dark for dinner. I suppose like you being put with the loch Ness Monster and Sasquatch, you want to categorize me as a UFO whackado. I didn't know there was an avionics journalist alive that didn't believe in UFOs, or is it just you don't consider them to be Unidentified?
Later in life I told my military friends, my family, and even reported to MUFON over the last ~10 years. Only more recently have I been willing to hang my arse out and tell my story to others, because as I age I care less about what others think. I was was not a meek child, a bit of a Tom Boy and tenacious. I have always been okay with what happened and have wanted to be hypnotized to try and unlock more information, but never knew where to go and who to see. I welcome challenges, as anyone would telling the truth. Your truths about a missing plane are theories based on some knowns and some possibilities, plus some none impossibilities. My truth when it comes to a UFO is based on live physical experience. It's always easy to discount a child, but would anyone discount their child at age 8, if they came home and said a man tried to grab me into his car but I ran. People see what they want to see, but they also believe what they want to believe when they are given information. Does this mean I believe Ashton Forbes theory? Not in this case, but who knows whether something odd didn't happen and the plane entered some area taking out instrumentation in clouds and the plane came out somewhere else totally disoriented. Shoot maybe it's at the bottom of the Bering Sea ( :
I am not saying I think this happened, but strange things have happened on this Earth that so far are unexplainable, but not unreal. He is just putting forth one more theory.
Ufos aren't real then how come the U.S and multiple other militarys are now saying the complete opposite plus the fact commercial pilots are now coming forward and the reports are mind blowing unlike your second rate report .
Ashton Forbes' research and theory have achieved success due to their extensive and thorough nature. The distinction between conspiracy and conspiracy theory lies in the application of the scientific method, which involves gathering actual scientific data, corroborating it, identifying contradictions, and comprehensively analyzing the findings. Ashton Forbes applies this approach to his research alongside authors of scientific papers who testify as guests on technology-related topics.
Regarding 9/11, I must mention Dr. Judy Wood. She is the only published researcher with degrees in Structural Engineering who has employed this same scientific method. Additionally, MH370 technology supports her findings and data.
None of Dunbar's disputes are based on scientific data; they consist of opinions or unprovable "convenient" hearsay evidence that lack scientifically researched or peer-reviewed studies.
I am interested in your thoughts on my comment; please feel free to email me at your convenience at cr8zdayz31@gmail.com. Thank you.
Ashton Forbes' research and theory have achieved success due to their extensive and thorough nature. The distinction between conspiracy and conspiracy theory lies in the application of the scientific method, which involves gathering actual scientific data, corroborating it, identifying contradictions, and comprehensively analyzing the findings. Ashton Forbes applies this approach to his research alongside authors of scientific papers who testify as guests on technology-related topics.
Regarding 9/11, I must mention Dr. Judy Wood. She is the only published researcher with degrees in Structural Engineering who has employed this same scientific method. Additionally, MH370 technology supports her findings and data.
None of Dunbar's disputes are based on scientific data; they consist of opinions or unprovable "convenient" hearsay evidence that lack scientifically researched or peer-reviewed studies.
I am interested in your thoughts on my comment; please feel free to email me at your convenience at cr8zdayz31@gmail.com. Thank you.
No, Ashton Forbes is 100 percent crank. He is not gathering scientific data, he is manufacturing obvious nonsense, but you believe it because you want to believe it. You are an extremely gullible rube.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/e4aCkya5izLFSdf8Xm0xz9aiK
In your post production segment you discuss using "drifters" for debris tracking evaluations. A company that may be worth taking to is Saildrone from Alameda California. They deploy unmanned data gathering devices all over the ocean world for currents, tide, depths, temperatures, etc for the sale of the data. This humanitarian challenge may be something that would also interest them.
Mark, I like your thinking -- I'm sure Saildrone could have a lot of interesting Lepas data, but when I reached out to them they didn't want to talk about anything beyond their actual projects.
Hi Jeff,
This was another great episode! We really enjoyed your guest and would like to read his book. It's incredible that Ashton Forbes wants people to believe that he not only solved the mystery of MH370 but was able to catch it on video at several different, perfectly clear angles. What you said about how "the algorithm is the gatekeeper" is bang on and sums up the world today very well (a depressing thought). Keep up the good work!
Thanks so much, Rochelle! Really glad you liked it. Yes, not only was the magical moment caught in perfect clarity from two different angles, but in addition to solving aviation's greatest mystery he obtained the first unambiguous footage of a UFO (three, no less!) as well as proving the existence of wormholes. So, quite an achievement, probably worth three Nobel prizes at least.
lol
Mr. Wise.
You are categorically incorrect in matter of your gross over exaggerations, of your own biased beliefs & prejudices, regarding ‘UFOs’ & a few other ridiculous things you’re insisting.
From your own writ;
“On its face, the whole thing is ridiculous.
^Merely dismissive opinion.
You wish us to not proceed into the material with open minds, then, but to instead, adopt your ‘ultimatum of assumptive belief’.
For one thing, UFOs aren’t real — or, if they are, they’ve never so casually revealed themselves as they do in this video.
^OH, PLZZZZ.
Go ahead & call the Military & Commercial Pilots & highly trained, experienced Surveillance Technicians of the WORLD, all liars.
My favorite would be the
USS Nimitz’ escort vessels having been watching a bunch of ‘UFOs’, for at least a week,
on our best combat radars, before directing Com. Fravor’s fought to inspect them.
All those pilots & backseat technologists must all be crazy liars?
You prefer that?
Besides other very otherwise serious Mil-Industrial functions of States, that have been very committed to a
8 decade shell game, that’s been painfully obvious.
As far as I’d insist, is, it’s a really big Galaxy out there, or, Interdimensionally, that it should not be surprising, if very intelligent life exists & is even in our home environment.
Your bias is showing, & why couldn’t ET life, if advanced beyond ourselves, exist, let alone have means to execute their travels?
And interdimensional portals aren’t real, either, except in Marvel movies.
^You are speaking in ignorance here.
ID Portals have been visually & electronically recorded by the Research Crew at Skywalker Ranch.
Insisting they *could only exist* in Marvel comics media, expresses only your bias; & ignorance.
Yet for a great many people, the videos seem seem utterly real. They think that Ashton Forbes has solved the mystery of MH370.”
^I’ve just started screening the Forbes material.
My opinion on MH370 media & analysis, will still be out for months moreso, I bet.
And this is the only point I’ll give you a break about.
You’ve simply typed up a personally aggravated waste of text, hoping to convince others that your assumptiveness, is somehow, the BEST & ONLY opinion to believe?
How very arrogant & ignorant of you; I’ve neither, assumed a blasted thing about said videos, I’ve never been even hopeful, that such a terrible thing could even be possible.
I recall the Military downings of civilian aircraft over the past few decades, it’s a terrible topic, & why should we assume, it ‘couldn’t have been’ a Military mistake, or similar fault?
What if it’s not ‘UFOs’?
We must examine all aspects before going sputtering Mick West type assumptions & bad guesses, as you’ve done here.
Do I wish ‘to believe’?
In general, YES, it would help me understand my own ET & UFO experiences.
Go ahead & call ME, a liar.
What should I CARE?
I’d certainly say all of this to your face in public, as well.
Adjust your ego, knave.
I wouldn't use the word "liar," I would use the word "delusional." And I don't think it's a matter of mental illness. I just think that people are entered by the idea that fantastical things could be real, and so choose to suspend their critical reasoning.
Try answering to my exact points, instead of deflecting & attempting obsfucation.
Let me be more succinct, then: you are delusional.
i have a 70 page pdf proving that America has access to the technology to make what is depicted. in the videos by regicide_anon. you talk about widely accepted evidence for what happened to MH370. Well here it is. https://x.com/i/grok/share/e4aCkya5izLFSdf8Xm0xz9aiK
Forbes doesn't claim the orbs are UAP. He says this is secret government technology. His claim is the U.S. took the plane.
But does it matter what he's claiming? The whole thing is so absurd on its face, it's like arguing about whether the earth is flat or shaped like a Pringle...
Jeff, I really appreciated your guest. Webster's Dictionary needs to place his picture in their entry for "sanity." Reaching back to 9/11, my only personal connection to the events of that day concerns a woman in my wife's writers' group. Her husband was giving flying lessons in Florida and had three Middle Eastern men come in for lessons. On their second visit, Rick heard some talk that concerned him. He called the FBI, and was told that they would look into it. He called back sometime later and pretty much got blown off. When the pictures of the 9/11 hijackers were shown, the three who had come for lessons were among them.
As for Rick, he was the Captain of that Atlas Air 767 that crashed into Trinity Bay near Houston. He was handling the radio when the pilot flying thought he was in a stall and went full forward on the yoke. Sad ending for a good man.
Thanks, Tom. That's an incredible story.