When the flaperon came ashore on Reunion in July of 2015, search officals were quite excited, because they realized they had new important evidence about where the plane had hit the water. But when they analyzed the shells, they were stumped. The barnacles were too small, meaning that they were too young. And not by a little! Based on what was known about barnacle growth rates at the time, it seemed like there was a year-long gap between how long the object had been floating and when the barnacles had started to grow.
No one knew how to explain that puzzle. Maybe the barnacles grew slower that people realized. Or maybe there are predators in the ocean that strip a piece clean so they have to regrow.
It looked strange, but since the data on Lepas growth rates was pretty thin, the authorities just shrugged. They assumed there had to be a reasonable explanation.
Well, we don’t have to leave it at that. Because in fact there is tons of data out there just sitting there waiting to be collected.
NOAA has over a thousand drifters floating around the ocean at any given time, and you can see them on the web. Click on a map, see the information on the drifter. (You can find even more drifter data here.) The data includes where it’s been for every single hour since it was deployed, and what the water temp was, so each of those drifters has a population of Lepas that will let you correlate water temperature with growth rate.
If you get a bunch of them you can also see how robust these correlations are — are they sometimes picked clean, or do they always have barnacles whose size matches the length of time they’ve been in the water. By collecting this data, I believe we can make real progress towards finally determining what happened to MH370.
In today’s episode, I talk about my first effort to collect data from a NOAA drifter. It turned out to be a pretty wild ride!
Special thanks to John boen Jonijo of Malindi Marine Boat Excursions and to Justin Aniere of Che Shale. And of course as always to Keelie, an indefatigable researcher and font of ideas.
That's too funny. Glad we got it sorted out!
And when I look at the map I see the plane would have to have flown near the Himalayas. Shangri La anyone? Inexperienced pilots would be unfamiliar with handling transting over high altitude mountains. Did Tomnod do a search of possible mountain crash sites?