To watch Deep Dive MH370 on YouTube, click the image above. To listen to the audio version on Apple Music, Spotify, or Amazon Music, click here.
For a concise, easy-to-read overview of the material in this podcast I recommend my 2019 book The Taking of MH370, available on Amazon.
Interested in connecting with a growing, passionate audience? Let’s talk. Email andy@onmilwaukee.com
In the months after the disappearance of MH370, Malaysian police searched for any clues that might suggest that the plane’s captain, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, was the culprit. This would have been the simplest explanation for why the Boeing 777 suddenly went electronically dark and pulled a U-turn forty minutes into its flight, and scarcely a minute after Shah’s voice was heard over the radio calmly telling air traffic controllers “Good night, Malaysia 370.” But to their chagrin, the evidence was slim. Zaharie had left no note. His family and friends had noticed no sign of mental disturbance. There was no evidence of political or religious extremism or of marital discord. He was under no financial pressure. He just didn’t fit the profile of someone who would kill hundreds of innocent people and take his own life in the process.
The police did find, however, a single piece of evidence pointing at Shah. In his home they found a hard drive that contained a flight simulation program as well as data points created when he saved simulated flights. Six data points recorded on February 2, 2014, were of particular interest. It looked like they came from a single 777 flight that took off from Kuala Lumpur International Airport, went up the Malacca Strait, passed the tip of Sumatra, then turned south and wound up with zero fuel over the remote southern Indian Ocean. This route so uncannily resembled the flight path deduced from MH370’s radar track and then satcom symbols that it was taken by many as smoking-gun evidence that Shah had practiced absconding with the plane. Some even believe that the flight-sim files could offer clues as to where to find the plane. (Indeed, the discovery of the flight sim files was one of the reasons that the authorities shifted the surface search area in mid-April 2014.)
The final two save points deserve special attention. They are located just 2 nautical miles apart in the far southern Indian Ocean. In both data files the plane has zero fuel and zero engine thrust. In the first, the plane is at 37,651 feet and flying at approximately 198 knots indicated airspeed, which is close to the speed recommended in the 777 Flight Crew Operating Manual in the event a plane loses both engines. In the second, the plane is flying much the same way but the altitude has manually adjusted to 4000 feet. In both cases the plane is actually in a climb. The fact that the plane is gaining altitude in both cases is consistent with a pilot who is hand-flying the airplane and so unable to prevent temporary departures from ideal speed and glideslope. In other words, as the plane gets going too fast he pulls the nose up, and if it starts going too slow he puts the nose down. It’s difficult and requires constant attention–the kind of thing that’s fun for a little while as recreation and dreadful if you have to do it for a long time as part of your job.
So, then, the heart of the matter: what was Shah trying to experience at the two final save points?
One theory is that he wanted to know what it would be like to point his plane into the remote ocean and just sit and wait for it to run out of fuel. But we know that he didn’t do this, because the distance traveled by the simulated flight doesn’t match the plane’s fuel load and burn rate. He got to these end points by manually moving the plane in map mode, not by laboriously flying there. His motivation must have involved doing something at those spots, rather than the process of getting there.
To me, one plausible explanation is that Shah wanted to practice responding to the loss of both engines. This is something that happens on occasion, not always with disastrous results. On July 23, 1983, an Air Canada 767 en route from Montreal to Edmonton ran out of fuel at 41,000 feet due to an improperly calculated fuel load. Thanks to their amazing airmanship, the pilots managed to guide the plane to a safe landing onto the only possible landing spot, a disused air base near Gimli, Manitoba, that had been turned into a drag-racing strip. In the aviation world, this legendary feat has been memorialized as the “Gimli Glider.”
The second of these save points reminds me of “The Miracle on the Hudson,” the 2009 incident in which a US Airways A320 hit a flock of geese that destroyed both its engines and then glided to a safe ditching. That descent began at 3,060 feet, an altitude similar to the one selected in the simulator.
If it’s true that Shah was practicing emergency procedures on February 2, rather than planning his demise, it must be acknowledged as a freakish coincidence that the simulated flight’s end so eerily foreshadowed MH370’s presumed end. But there are mitigating factors. For one thing, Shah was a flight-sim enthusiast who flew many kinds of aircraft in many locations under many circumstances. Investigators found data files for more than 600 simulated flights on various hard drives in his home. Given that number, it would frankly be surprising if one or two of them didn’t resemble the accident flight in some way.
Also, bear in mind that Shah’s apparent suicide run into the southern Indian Ocean wasn’t his final simulation. On the same day that he practiced engine-out procedure on the 777, he also flew a historical propellor transport, the DC-3. And three weeks later, he played with a Boeing 737. This is hardly the behavior of a man with a monomaniacal obsession with his upcoming demise.
We’ll probably never know for sure why Shah decided to simulate an engine-out descent over the remote southern Indian Ocean scarcely a month before MH370 disappeared. But if we look at the entirety of the evidence collected by the police–and indeed even if we look only at the evidence contained on Shah’s various hard drives–then the flight sim data comes to seem an unconvincing smoking gun.
The 10th anniversary of MH370 is fast approaching, and it will probably be the last opportunity for the victims families & aviation experts to make reasonable demands of investigators while the flying public & world’s press is watching.
I have an idea that I genuinely believe will lead to a wealth of new, actionable information about what happened (and could not have happened) on March 8, 2014. You may have heard the concept before but please read to the end & hear me out fully. I’d love to know your thoughts afterward.
I believe the MH370 community should use upcoming press interviews and media attention around the 10 year anniversary to make an important request - one that would’ve definitely been granted long ago if the US led NTSB were the lead investigative agency.
The request is simple: victim’s families and aviation experts should demand investigators obtain a Boeing 777-ER with a similar equipment fit out as 9M-MRO (MH370) - and then have test pilots attempt to SAFELY re-create the first few KNOWN hours of flight MH370, up to the final turn South. The goal wouldn’t be to replicate the BTO or BFO values, instead the real treasure trove of data would come via tests performed on the electrical, pressurization & communication systems.
Back in Episode 6 - Reboot Redux - you provided great insight about the electrical system. In that episode you said “What we wind up with is a plane that’s in an electrical configuration that I don’t think any plane has ever been in before or since.” - Jeff Wise
So let’s probe this: You and Andy have made it very clear that you don’t accept the prevailing mainstream theory which has Captain Zaharie Ahmed Shah allegedly absconding with the plane after he intentionally de-energized all communication systems & depressurized the plane. So why not have test pilots SAFELY & PROPERLY test this hypothesis to see if this mainstream theory is even possible? After settling into a cruise at FL 350 (35,000 feet), the test pilots should attempt to disable ALL methods of communication without leaving the cockpit and fly the plane exactly as Zaharie allegedly did - all while documenting what actually happens. If the test pilots can’t replicate what was (and wasn’t) seen on the ground, then this testing could exonerate the Captain completely!
Here are just a few of many potential flight tests that could provide long awaited answers:
See if the test pilots can ACTUALLY stop ALL equipment (including the SDU) from communicating without sending log off messages. If all the necessary circuit breakers aren’t accessible from the cockpit then entire sources of power may have to be removed from an entire electrical bus.
Let’s see EXACTLY what happens if the entire left A/C electric bus was de-energized while airborne.
Let’s see how the ELMS power management system behaves in this non-normal electrical state and what the consequences would be.
Let’s see how the autopilot, navigation system & fly by wire control laws behave with 1/2 the electrical system out.
Let’s see if the cockpit door lock reveals any vulnerabilities as a result of the reduced electrical state.
Now let’s see if the test pilots can re-energize the SDU from the cockpit only, without any other aircraft system like the ACARS or transponder broadcasting any previously entered flight information.
Let’s see how the simple act of removing and re-energizing power to the ADIRU at a location hundreds of miles from where it was powered off would affect the important Air Data Inertial Reference Unit? Is it possible this would feed false data to the SDU and navigation system? Perhaps that alone could cause that false trail of breadcrumbs you wrote about?
Next, with crew oxygen masks on, the pilots should attempt to depressurize the plane. For those that think Zarharie did it:
Let’s see how quickly the temperature drops without pressurization and how cold the cockpit gets.
Let’s see how long the test pilots could comfortably fly the plane in these depressurized conditions while wearing only a pilots uniform.
Let’s see how rapid a depressurization event would be if it were initiated from the cockpit.
Let’s see what happens when electricity is removed & later re-applied to the critical pressure controllers, outflow valves & other integrated computer systems. During a typical 777 power up sequence the plane thinks it’s on the ground and the pressurization system automatically opens the outflow valves fully to self test them!
Let’s see if any other unexpected pressurization events might happen…
For those who think these Airborne Tests aren’t necessary because a flight simulator or Boeing flight manual will explain to investigators everything that will happen, think again….Just WEEKS AGO on Jan 5, 2024 a door plug blew off an Alaska Airlines flight causing a mid air depressurization of a new Boeing 737 Max 9 at about 16,000 feet. But here’s the bombshell that ties Alaska Airtight flight AS-1282 to MH-370:
After the Alaska Airlines incident the NTSB revealed that the depressurization event CAUSED THE LOCKED, BULLETPROOF COCKPIT DOOR TO UNLOCK AND SWING WIDE OPEN! NOBODY, NOT EVEN THE PILOTS OR FLIGHT CREW EXPECTED THAT TO HAPPEN AS BOEING WITHHELD THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM THEIR CREW TRAINING AND SAFETY MANUALS. The cockpit door wasn’t defective either- It turns out that Boeing actually designs their cockpit doors to unlock and immediately open when a depressurization event occurs! So would the same thing happen if a larger Boeing 777 were rapidly depressurized at a much higher altitude in flight by the Captain? Only Airborne testing under several scenarios will give the full answer, but if so, the whole theory about pilot murder-suicide would come apart, and Captain Shah’s family could finally rest easier knowing that he likely couldn’t have stolen the airplane with the cockpit door wide open.
It’s for these reasons why I believe the VERY BEST chance of finding MH-370 is for investigators to perform these important & long overdue tests of the 777’s electrical & pressurization systems in the air on a real Boeing 777 while flying - NOT IN A SIMULATOR. Truth is that the 777 has so many interconnected systems, nobody really knows how purpose built flight software & firmware will behave with each other when certain components are powered off.
In order to make this request a reality, all those who are influential in the MH 370 community should advocate for the idea of Actual Flight Tests & Flight Recreation during media interviews on and around the 10th anniversary. It’s the only way that we are going to get NEW & CREDIBLE data which can point us in the right direction for a new search. If we get the word out together, we can solve Aviation's Greatest Mystery! Will you support this idea?
I did not know the details of the last 2 datapoints. I must say this makes me think differently about them. More of a red flag. So yes, it would be very nice to hear more about how Windows saves things, and if they are truly legit. They don't seem to match the first few datapoints